ZUS and Mixue spark bazaar debate, but where does social sentiment lean?

When two beverage giants set up shop at Ramadan bazaars this year, social feeds lit up. Across Threads, Reddit and X, Malaysians debated whether big brands were disrupting small seasonal traders, or simply competing on fair terms.

Homegrown chain ZUS Coffee and Chinese-origin dessert brand Mixue quickly made headlines after appearing at several bazaars nationwide. With drinks priced from RM3.90 at ZUS and around RM4 at Mixue, comparisons were inevitable. Traditional air balang (container drinks) beverages, typically priced between RM5 and RM10, suddenly found themselves under sharper scrutiny.

At first glance, the conversation seemed to skew toward outrage. Critics questioned whether deep-pocketed chains were edging out small vendors who depend on Ramadan footfall to make ends meet. Concerns around scale, purchasing power and the erosion of small business income surfaced almost instantly.

But beneath the noise, the data tells a more nuanced story. Social intelligence insights from Dataxet Malaysia, alongside a deeper dive into online commentary, suggest that public sentiment may not be as one-sided as it first appeared.

Don't miss: ZUS Coffee makes Thailand debut amid Southeast Asia expansion

Across the monitored conversations, 65% of sentiment skewed positive, 30% negative and 5% neutral. The dominant theme, accounting for half of all discussions, centred on strong support for affordable branded drinks and consumer choice.

Many netizens described the RM3.90 to RM4 price points as “cheap” and “worth it”, often contrasting them with bazaar beverages they characterised as overly diluted, too sweet or inconsistent in quality. Phrases such as “my money, my choice” were repeatedly echoed, with consumers asserting their right to prioritise value, hygiene and brand reliability, especially amid ongoing cost-of-living pressures.

Another 20% of comments dismissed complaints from small vendors as overdue. Some accused certain traders of inflating prices over the years without improving quality, framing the arrival of large chains as a form of “market correction”. Rather than calling for protectionism, these voices urged small businesses to innovate, improve standards and compete on merit.

A further 15% explicitly welcomed what they saw as healthy competition. Supporters argued that the presence of established brands could drive better pricing discipline, raise overall quality and even attract more foot traffic to bazaars. A handful went further, suggesting that more big names should participate to revitalise what they perceive as increasingly expensive and underwhelming festive marketplaces.

That said, dissenting views were not absent. About 10% of conversations expressed sympathy for seasonal traders, highlighting high stall rental fees and the reliance on Ramadan as a critical income period. These voices warned against large corporations squeezing out micro-entrepreneurs who lack economies of scale.

Against this backdrop, both brands carry distinct positioning narratives.

Dataxet Malaysia’s word cloud reveals that affordability and taste sat at the heart of the debate. Dominant terms such as “murah” (cheap), “harga” (price), “duit” (money), “berbaloi” (worth it), “sedap” (tasty), and “lebih murah” (cheaper)  point to a conversation driven less by brand loyalty and more by economic agency. Netizens zeroed in on value, weighing RM3.90 to RM4 branded drinks against RM5 to RM10 air balang options, framing their choices as smart spending rather than disloyalty. Words such as “ringgit,” “promo,” and “cup” further underscore how price and perceived quality became markers of fairness during Ramadan.

At the same time, the cloud highlights sharp polarisation. Terms such as “hak” (rights), “pembeli” (buyer), “peniaga” (business owner), “kesian” (pity), and “rezeki” (livelihood) signal a tug of war between consumer rights and sympathy for small traders. Phrases linking “hak” (right) and “duit sendiri” (own finances) reflect a strong assertion of personal choice, while others stressed compassion for seasonal livelihoods. Even practical words such as “air balang” (container drinks), “ais” (ice), and “gula” (sugar) kept the debate grounded in product experience, though the broader narrative ultimately revolved around competition, scale, and who benefits most during the festive economy.

Meeting Malaysians where they are

ZUS, which has long positioned itself as a Malaysian-first brand through culturally attuned campaigns and local storytelling, told A+M that its bazaar kiosk is currently operated directly by the company as a pilot for a microentrepreneur programme set to launch later this year, aimed at empowering more small businesses. Rather than replacing its existing marketing touchpoints, the Ramadan bazaar presence appears to be an additional layer in its localisation playbook.

Earlier this month, ZUS rolled out a large scale on ground activation at Sunway Pyramid for the launch of its NGUPI 2in1 0% Gula variant, transforming the concourse into a kopitiam-inspired space filled with interactive games and booths. The brand has also maintained in store visibility through grocery activations for the same product push. For Ramadan, ZUS extended its efforts with a “Berbuka Bersama” (break fast together) bundle promotion and introduced branded sampul Raya (Raya packet), ensuring it remains present across bazaars, online platforms and physical outlets throughout the festive season.

Mixue, meanwhile, has anchored its growth on accessibility. Beyond malls, the brand is commonly found in shoplot rows, bus stations, food truck parks and neighbourhood hubs nationwide, positioning itself squarely within the rhythms of everyday Malaysian life. Its Ramadan bazaar move can be seen as a natural extension of this mass market strategy. As the fasting month began, Mixue Malaysia swiftly pivoted from its Chinese New Year marketing to puasa (fasting) themed content, collaborating with creators for KOL engagements and dressing its Snow King mascot in baju Melayu (traditional Malay outfit) to localise its messaging and drive relevance during the season.

The episode offers a timely reminder that scale alone does not determine public favour. In an inflationary climate where consumers are increasingly price sensitive, affordability, consistency and perceived value can outweigh concerns about brand size. What initially appeared to be a backlash narrative evolved into a more nuanced conversation about choice, fairness and competition.

In the court of public opinion, both chains may have weathered criticism, but sentiment data suggests they also strengthened their positioning with value conscious consumers. If anything, the Ramadan bazaar debate underscores a broader truth: when brands meet real needs at the right price point, controversy can quickly turn into commercial and reputational opportunity.

Featured image photo credits: @ngomel._ on Threads.

Related articles:
How ZUS Coffee leaned into music and physical experiences with 'Drip & Drop'
Threads is heating up as Malaysian brands serve sass and banter
Malaysian brands, it’s how you make them feel that counts